Chicago vs Chicago Terminal round 3

[D. Kaniuk]

Another filing by City of Chicago:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ba7f93537688b8e5852573210004b318/413cbdd14c167ee1852576a9007336e9/$FILE/226285.PDF

[D. Kaniuk]

Chicago Terminal has replied:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ba7f93537688b8e5852573210004b318/35a5a7ab7a526e0e852576ab00736cf5/$FILE/226301.PDF

[Charlie S]

Touché.  
\"Da City\" seems to have been caught helping along it\'s case??
(Gee, what a shock . . .) :-)
 


MLW North Line Fan since 1954

[D. Kaniuk]

The empire strike back:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ba7f93537688b8e5852573210004b318/77ad6e29121af0ab852576ac0069b05b/$FILE/226311.PDF

[robertmroman]

Interesting stuff.

The links didn\'t work for me. If others have similar problems, go to http://www.stb.dot.gov and click on filings. The docket number is AB-1036 or you can search on \"Chicago\".

Incidentally, there doesn\'t seem to have been any traffic out to Goose Island for the past week.

be well,
bob roman

[TBurke]

Losing the trackage in question could be a mixed blessing for Chicago Terminal since on the positive side it would also release them from the maintenance and liability issues associated with operations on city streets.

Either way, I hate to lose any street trackage and wish the railroad luck in their fight.

[cnwnorthline]

And people say trains are boring.  This railroad has almost as much drama as Tiger Woods.

[D. Kaniuk]

Another reply:
http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ba7f93537688b8e5852573210004b318/6c483c8efb68d431852576b3007ea7e0/$FILE/226338.PDF